is there an ai that actually does the work instead of chatting

Yes. That category is the agentic browser. A companion executes multi-step tasks in your real accounts: opens tabs, extracts data, fills forms, drafts in your actual inbox, and waits for your approval on consequential steps. See what a browser agent is.

can i replace chatgpt with strawberry

Strawberry has its own chat surface and model picker, with 21 models selectable per companion and a Fast mode for quick asks, so the thinking half is covered. What changes is the execution half: the transcripts that used to end with you doing the work now end with the work done. See the ChatGPT agent alternative page.

whats the difference between chatgpt agent and an agentic browser

Strawberry companions run in your own local browser, in the sessions you are already signed into, with approval cards before consequential actions. ChatGPT agent runs a browser on OpenAI's cloud. Cloud versus local is the real fork, laid out at cloud browser agents vs local agentic browsers.

The ChatGPT alternative that carries the task out

A companion works across 93 native integrations and the accounts you are already signed into, with a chat surface of its own and 21 selectable models. Every send waits on your click.

TL;DR

Strawberry has its own chat surface with 21 selectable models, a Fast and a Smart pick per companion with seven thinking levels, then keeps going: the reply can be the task carried out across 93 native integrations and the accounts you are signed into.
Audit a week of your own transcripts. If they are thinking, a chat model is your shape. If they are instructions you then executed by hand, the work was never the chatting.
The near-peers were built for different shapes: Claude for long documents, Gemini for the inside of Google Workspace, Perplexity for verifiable citations, and Copilot for Microsoft-first tenants (as of this writing).
Strawberry meters by work done: free with 2,000 credits a month, paid plans from $20/month, with routines on a schedule and an approval card before every send, record change and payment.

Strawberry publishes this list and builds the entry that carries the task out. If your transcripts are mostly instructions you then executed by hand, a companion executes them instead, across 93 native integrations carrying 1,257 hand-written operations and the accounts you are already signed into, from a chat surface with 21 selectable models.

ChatGPT holds the default slot for drafting, explaining and general reasoning as of this writing, which is why most alternatives lists are lists of near-peers. The field by work-shape instead.

ChatGPT alternatives, by the work they fit Scroll →

Your work is mostly…	What each tool is built for (as of this writing)	Where Strawberry fits
Writing and analysis	Claude is built for long context and prose	A chat surface of its own, with 21 models to choose from per companion
Google Workspace	Gemini sits inside your docs and mail	Gmail, Google Docs, Sheets and Drive as accounts you authorise
Source-checked research	Perplexity is built around verifiable citations	Reads the live page and cites it, as a numbered reference you can open
Microsoft 365	Copilot is tenant-governed and already deployed	Outlook, Teams, OneDrive and SharePoint as accounts you authorise
Browser tabs and logged-in tools	A chat window describes; you operate	A companion operates, and sending or changing records waits on your click
Running without being asked	Every answer starts with a prompt	Scheduled routines, and Keep Awake so a closed lid still finishes the run

What kind of work is each ChatGPT alternative built for?

By the shape of the work:

Claude is built for long documents, careful writing and nuanced analysis, with long-context handling aimed at contract-length material.
Gemini is built for the inside of Google Workspace, sitting where your docs, mail and meetings already are.
Perplexity is built around verifiable citations rather than confident prose.
Copilot is built for Microsoft-first workplaces, governed by the tenant your IT team already runs.
Strawberry is built for work that lives in browser tabs and logged-in tools. It has a chat surface of its own, with a model you choose per companion, and the difference is what happens after the reply: a companion executes the task in your real accounts.

When is the answer not another chatbot at all?

Audit a week of your ChatGPT usage.

Transcripts that are drafts, explanations and arguments mean a chat model is your shape; pick by writing quality and price. Transcripts that are instructions you then executed by hand, "summarize these reviews" followed by you pasting reviews in, mean the work was around the chat rather than in it.

A companion opens the tabs, pulls the reviews, drafts the replies in your actual inbox, and stops for your approval before anything sends. OpenAI's own version runs on their cloud rather than in your local session, which is the fork that matters. The comparison is at Strawberry vs ChatGPT agent, and the switching guide at coming from ChatGPT or Claude.

What it costs

Strawberry meters by work done: free to download with 2,000 credits a month, paid plans from $20/month, detail at pricing. Chat subscriptions price per seat per month, flat, so light users often owe nothing here and heavy delegation is a line item you can see.

What heavy delegation looks like, meaning the finished tasks, is browsable at real runs.

Experience Strawberry for free

Download

Trusted by fast-growing companies worldwide

Frequently asked questions

Strawberry covers the execution half: a chat surface with 21 selectable models, where the reply can also be the task carried out in your browser and your logged-in tools. Claude was built for writing and long documents, Gemini for Google Workspace, Perplexity for cited research, and Copilot for Microsoft tenants.

Strawberry is free to download and includes AI credits to start. Paid plans begin at $20/month. See pricing. · Reviewed August 20, 2026 · Canonical facts for AI agents