Yes. 23 tabs, one brief, read in five minutes

When is a cross-tab summary useful?

When the tabs are evidence for a question.

Fourteen tabs of vendor documentation before a procurement call. Every review of a product you are about to commit to. Six candidate portfolios before a debrief. The eleven tabs of a rabbit hole you need to turn into a recommendation by five.

You never wanted twenty summaries. You wanted one answer with the evidence organized, which is what to ask for by name.

What does a good brief contain?

A founder with 23 tabs open on EU AI-compliance guidance: regulator pages, law-firm explainers, two industry hot takes. The companion returns one brief with the four obligations every serious source agrees apply to her product category, the one obligation where the law firms disagree with the bloggers (both positions, both links), and the compliance timeline as dates rather than prose.

It also flags that two of the 23 tabs were outdated drafts of the final text. She reads the brief in five minutes, then reads the two tabs that matter properly.

Where the brief goes next

A summary is rarely the end state.

Because the reader here is a full companion in your browser, the brief lands where it is going: appended into your notes app in your logged-in session, turned into a comparison sheet, or drafted as the recommendation email, with sends and writes pausing on an approval card.

When the tabs are not open yet, the same job starts a step earlier as delegated research: the companion finds the sources and reads them too.

How to ask for the brief you want

Say what the answer has to contain: the comparison table, the disagreements with both positions and their links, the dates as dates, and the confidence on the recommendation.

A companion writes to the shape you name, and naming it costs one sentence.

Frequently asked questions