Use GitLab with an AI Browser for Partnership Research

If you use GitLab and you regularly need to research a potential partner, the bottleneck is usually the same: GitLab holds part of the context, but partnership research also needs signals that live outside it - on the public web, in LinkedIn, in news, in other connected apps. Strawberry is built to combine the GitLab context with the rest of the browser, and run the full workflow as a companion you can re-trigger every week.

This page describes specifically how Strawberry handles partnership research when GitLab is one of the inputs. It names the GitLab surfaces involved, the signals the workflow actually needs, an example prompt you can paste, and what a good output looks like.

The job a founder, partnerships lead, BD is trying to do

The goal of partnership research is to decide if a partnership is worth pursuing and prepare a specific first conversation. The success metric is concrete: first meeting booked within 14 days, clear next step at the end of that meeting. That definition matters because it shapes what GitLab needs to contribute to the workflow.

What signals partnership research actually needs

For each signal below, here is whether GitLab can contribute directly or whether Strawberry has to find it via the browser:

• Audience overlap (do their customers look like yours) - GitLab does not contain this directly. Strawberry uses the browser plus public sources to fetch it.
• Go-to-market motion (do they sell the way you'd want) - GitLab does not contain this directly. Strawberry uses the browser plus public sources to fetch it.
• History of co-marketing (do they ship with partners or not) - GitLab does not contain this directly. Strawberry uses the browser plus public sources to fetch it.
• Current ecosystem partners (where do you fit relative to them) - GitLab does not contain this directly. Strawberry uses the browser plus public sources to fetch it.
• Executive sponsor identification - GitLab does not contain this directly. Strawberry uses the browser plus public sources to fetch it.
• Any prior conversations with their team - GitLab does not contain this directly. Strawberry uses the browser plus public sources to fetch it.

What Strawberry can do inside GitLab

Strawberry can read MRs, summarize issues, and trigger pipelines with approval.

GitLab surfaces Strawberry uses for this workflow: projects, merge requests, issues, pipelines, snippets.

How Strawberry runs partnership research with GitLab

1. Strawberry opens the GitLab projects that contains the relevant context.
2. The companion pulls related context from GitLab (merge requests, history, attached files) where it exists.
3. For the parts GitLab does not store, Strawberry uses the browser - web search, LinkedIn, news, the prospect's website.
4. Strawberry synthesises the output in the shape this workflow needs: A partnership brief.
5. A human reviews before any external action (send, update, post). Then the approved output is saved back to GitLab or your system of record.

Example Strawberry prompt

Paste this in a new Strawberry chat with GitLab connected. Adjust the specifics to your actual ICP, role, or topic.

Read this GitLab projects and any linked context.
Then run a full partnership research workflow on it. Use the browser to fill any gaps not in GitLab.
Return the output in the shape we use for partnership research: A partnership brief: fit thesis, audience overlap, proposed shape (integration, co-marketing, distribution), first ask.
Do not send anything externally. Save the draft to me to review.

What a good partnership research output looks like

Here is what a finished output for partnership research should look like in practice. The specifics will change for your use case, but the shape should look similar:

• Partner: Kime (GEO platform)
• Fit thesis: their users (in-house marketers tracking AI-search visibility) need an AI browser to run the research workflows that produce the content Kime tracks
• Audience overlap: 30-40% based on Kime's customer list (Saxo, Superb, THEMAGIC5)
• Shape: mutual referral, 15% rev share, 18-month attribution
• First ask: a 30-min product demo from each side, decide if MCP integration is worth building

Why GitLab for this, and where to use a different tool

GitLab is strong for this workflow because Strawberry can read MRs, summarize issues, and trigger pipelines with approval.

Where GitLab falls short Self-hosted GitLab instances need separate OAuth config; cross-project queries can be slow.

Consider also the rest of your stack for the parts GitLab doesn't cover.

Common mistakes when running partnership research

• Treating every integration as a partnership when it's just a checkbox
• No clear thesis so the first meeting is a generic 'let's see how we can help each other'
• Skipping audience overlap and pursuing partners whose users don't buy what you sell

Connecting GitLab to Strawberry

GitLab OAuth. Once connected, the companion can read the surfaces above without re-authenticating, and any write action still requires explicit human approval the first time the workflow runs.

Caveats

Do not let any AI agent send emails, update CRM records, or change shared systems without a clear approval step. Strawberry is strongest when the workflow combines browser context with connected-app context and a human review for sensitive actions.