Use GitHub with an AI Browser for Campaign Research

If you use GitHub and you regularly need to research a campaign or partnership before it ships, the bottleneck is usually the same: GitHub holds part of the context, but campaign research also needs signals that live outside it - on the public web, in LinkedIn, in news, in other connected apps. Strawberry is built to combine the GitHub context with the rest of the browser, and run the full workflow as a companion you can re-trigger every week.

This page describes specifically how Strawberry handles campaign research when GitHub is one of the inputs. It names the GitHub surfaces involved, the signals the workflow actually needs, an example prompt you can paste, and what a good output looks like.

The job a marketer, founder, partnership manager is trying to do

The goal of campaign research is to gather the context needed to brief, target, and de-risk a campaign before spending budget. The success metric is concrete: campaign launches on time, CAC within target, and creative does not need a rewrite mid-flight. That definition matters because it shapes what GitHub needs to contribute to the workflow.

What signals campaign research actually needs

For each signal below, here is whether GitHub can contribute directly or whether Strawberry has to find it via the browser:

• Audience segmentation (who exactly buys this) - GitHub does not contain this directly. Strawberry uses the browser plus public sources to fetch it.
• Competitor messaging already in the space - GitHub does not contain this directly. Strawberry uses the browser plus public sources to fetch it.
• Winning ad examples (Meta Ad Library, LinkedIn) - GitHub does not contain this directly. Strawberry uses the browser plus public sources to fetch it.
• Channel-fit (does the audience even read this channel) - GitHub does not contain this directly. Strawberry uses the browser plus public sources to fetch it.
• Creative reference library - GitHub does not contain this directly. Strawberry uses the browser plus public sources to fetch it.
• Compliance constraints (data, privacy, claims) - GitHub does not contain this directly. Strawberry uses the browser plus public sources to fetch it.

What Strawberry can do inside GitHub

Strawberry can read PR diffs, summarize issues, comment with approval, and search code across repos.

GitHub surfaces Strawberry uses for this workflow: repos, PRs, issues, commits, Actions.

How Strawberry runs campaign research with GitHub

1. Strawberry opens the GitHub repos that contains the relevant context.
2. The companion pulls related context from GitHub (PRs, history, attached files) where it exists.
3. For the parts GitHub does not store, Strawberry uses the browser - web search, LinkedIn, news, the prospect's website.
4. Strawberry synthesises the output in the shape this workflow needs: A campaign brief.
5. A human reviews before any external action (send, update, post). Then the approved output is saved back to GitHub or your system of record.

Example Strawberry prompt

Paste this in a new Strawberry chat with GitHub connected. Adjust the specifics to your actual ICP, role, or topic.

Read this GitHub repos and any linked context.
Then run a full campaign research workflow on it. Use the browser to fill any gaps not in GitHub.
Return the output in the shape we use for campaign research: A campaign brief: audience, channels, messaging hypotheses, creative refs, KPIs, risks.
Do not send anything externally. Save the draft to me to review.

What a good campaign research output looks like

Here is what a finished output for campaign research should look like in practice. The specifics will change for your use case, but the shape should look similar:

• Campaign: AI browser launch on Meta Ads - Nordic ICP
• Audience: founders + ops leads at 10-200 person SaaS companies in SE/DK/NO
• Channels: Meta Ads (primary), LinkedIn (secondary), founder LinkedIn organic
• Messaging: 'The browser that does the boring work' - 3 variants
• Risks: Meta still needs Business Verification stable; budget capped at €500/wk in test phase

Why GitHub for this, and where to use a different tool

GitHub is strong for this workflow because Strawberry can read PR diffs, summarize issues, comment with approval, and search code across repos.

Where GitHub falls short Private orgs need a separate OAuth app; rate limits on large repo searches.

Consider also the rest of your stack for the parts GitHub doesn't cover.

Common mistakes when running campaign research

• Skipping competitor analysis and rebuilding a positioning someone else already won
• Guessing at audience instead of pulling real segmentation
• No creative references so the team designs in a vacuum

Connecting GitHub to Strawberry

GitHub OAuth - currently three separate apps for prod/dev/local. Once connected, the companion can read the surfaces above without re-authenticating, and any write action still requires explicit human approval the first time the workflow runs.

Caveats

Do not let any AI agent send emails, update CRM records, or change shared systems without a clear approval step. Strawberry is strongest when the workflow combines browser context with connected-app context and a human review for sensitive actions.